Ambitious Investing education

What does a millionaire trader spend money on for entertainment?

In a RihariFX video, self-described millionaire trader Rihari spent money on a 20-seat NRL corporate box at a Broncos v Panthers match, covering food and tickets for mentorship students. This is one filmed anecdote from one trader, not a verified spending pattern across millionaire traders.

Published 13 September 2026 · Based on this Ambitious Investing video

What does a millionaire trader spend money on for entertainment, according to this video?

In the RihariFX video "Day in the Life of a Millionaire: Renting an Entire VIP Box," the entertainment spend shown is a 20-seat corporate box at an NRL match between the Broncos and Panthers, with food included and free tickets given to mentorship members. That is the only entertainment purchase this source documents.

There is no second example in the transcript. No cars, no travel, no watches, no property. Whatever a millionaire trader might spend on entertainment more broadly is not something this video addresses, and this article will not fill that gap with invented detail. What follows sticks to what the video actually shows and says, and marks clearly which parts are Rihari's own claims versus which parts can be checked against outside sources.

What happens in the "Day in the Life of a Millionaire" corporate box video?

The video opens at half time inside a corporate box at an NRL game, with Rihari narrating that the box was originally arranged for a family occasion. Ambitious Investing mentorship members are already there, food has been served, and the group is filmed enjoying the view before the segment moves into short interviews.

Rihari says the plan started small. He wanted tickets for his son's birthday and needed nine seats together for the family, but that block wasn't available, so he says he booked a 20-seat corporate box instead. With seats to spare, he says he invited a group of mentorship members along, calling it a chance to "hang out with the people that are actually learning" from the program. None of that booking detail, seat count, or cost is independently confirmed; it is presented to camera as Rihari's own account of how the night came together.

The rest of the video is built around a co-host, credited on screen as Ronnie, moving through the box and interviewing five mentorship members plus a senior student described as a top performer in the program. Each interview follows a similar pattern: how long they've been trading, what's been hardest, what advice they'd give someone on the fence, and who they credit as their mentor. The Broncos lose the game in the background, which Rihari acknowledges directly at the end, framing the night as being "about the experience" regardless of the result.

Who did Rihari invite into the box, and why?

Rihari invited mentorship students from Ambitious Investing after spare seats opened up when the box was booked for a family birthday. In the video, he frames it as a reward for the group "learning and also just making a ton of money" — a general description, not a figure tied to any individual student.

Five people are interviewed on camera: Chase, Jade, Cody, Darnell, and a mentor introduced as Jordan (also referred to as Hadi), described as the program's leading student. Each gives a short, personal account of their time in the mentorship, ranging from one year of trading (Chase, Jade, Cody) to since August of the current year (Darnell) to two years full time (Jordan). These are self-reported timeframes given in an interview setting filmed by the business that runs the mentorship, not figures drawn from an external record.

What do the mentorship students say about their trading results?

The students describe personal experiences with trading and the mentorship in their own words, and those experiences vary from one person to the next. Two answers stand out for including a specific, quantified claim, and both are personal statements rather than business-wide results.

Jordan says he has been trading full time for two years after first paying for education rather than trading live from the start. He says his biggest achievement has been "snowballing" his live account into six figures, and his stated goal for 2026 is to grow that account toward $1 million while holding $500,000 liquid in the bank. Cody says he has been trading for about a year, that he "lost money" early on, and that results "only got better" after he joined the mentorship; his stated goal is to quit his job. Chase, Jade, and Darnell describe lessons learned (discipline, patience, managing emotion) rather than dollar outcomes.

None of these figures come with an account statement, broker export, or third-party audit shown in the video. They are individual testimonials, filmed by the mentorship that both students are paying to be part of, describing outcomes for two people out of an unknown total number of members. Nothing here indicates what a typical member earns, loses, or achieves, and this article does not extend Jordan's or Cody's account to anyone else.

How do the video's claims compare against independently verified facts?

The video is a piece of marketing content produced by the mentorship it promotes, built around personal testimony rather than audited figures. Setting the specific claims next to what can actually be checked shows how much of the story rests on trust in the people speaking, not on external proof.

| Claim | Rihari says / the video shows | Independently verified | |---|---|---| | Entertainment spend | Rented a 20-seat NRL corporate box at Broncos v Panthers | Not verified: no invoice, price, or payment source shown | | Reason for booking | Booked around his son's birthday after a 9-seat block wasn't available | Not verified: personal account only | | Guests and food | Mentorship members invited free, with food included | Confirmed by the video's own footage of the event | | Jordan's trading result | Says he grew a live account to six figures, targeting $1 million plus $500,000 liquid by 2026 | Not verified: no account statement or audit shown | | Cody's trading result | Says he lost money initially, then improved after joining the mentorship | Not verified: personal testimonial only | | Retail CFD trader outcomes overall | Not addressed in the video | 68% of Australian retail CFD investors lost money in FY2024, per ASIC Report 828 | | Global forex market size | Not addressed in the video | US$9.6 trillion average daily OTC FX turnover in April 2025, per BIS 2025 Triennial Survey |

The pattern is consistent: everything filmed inside the box (the venue, the guests, the food, the interviews taking place) can be confirmed simply by watching the video. Everything about money (how the box was funded, what any student's account actually contains, what a typical member earns) cannot be confirmed from this source and is not confirmed anywhere else supplied here.

How should you evaluate a trading mentorship's lifestyle marketing before trusting it?

Content like this is designed to associate a mentorship with success and enjoyment, and it can do that honestly while still leaving the financial claims unverified. A short process helps separate the parts worth noting from the parts worth questioning.

  1. Identify who is speaking. Note whether a claim comes from the business owner, a paid mentor, or a paying student, since each has a different incentive to present things positively.
  2. Separate the scene from the number. The corporate box, the food, and the guest list are observable facts about one event. A dollar figure like "six figures" or "$1 million target" is a claim about someone's finances that the video cannot substantiate on its own.
  3. Check for third-party proof. Look for an account statement, a regulator record, or an audit attached to any performance claim. If none is shown, treat the number as a personal statement, not a verified result.
  4. Ask what population the claim covers. One or two students describing good outcomes says nothing about how many other members are doing worse, breaking even, or have left the program.
  5. Cross-check against independent data. Compare enthusiastic personal testimony against regulator or central-bank data on the activity being promoted, where such data exists.
  6. Decide based on verified risk, not atmosphere. A well-produced video, a nice venue, and a happy group of guests describe a marketing event, not a rate of return.

What do independently verified statistics say about retail trading risk?

The video does not mention risk statistics at all, so this section draws only on the two external sources permitted here, cited directly rather than folded into anyone's personal story. Both come from regulators, not from the mentorship or its guests.

The ASIC Report 828: Risky business records that 68% of Australian retail CFD investors lost money in the 2024 financial year. That figure describes the outcome for the majority of people trading CFDs as retail clients in Australia over a full financial year, which stands in contrast to the two positive personal accounts given inside the corporate box. It does not say what happened to any specific person in the video, and the video does not say whether its students trade CFDs, forex, or another instrument, so the two data points cannot be merged into a single claim.

Separately, the BIS 2025 Triennial Survey reported that average daily OTC foreign-exchange turnover reached US$9.6 trillion in April 2025. That figure describes the scale of the global market Rihari's mentorship trades within; it says nothing about whether any individual trader, mentor, or student profits from participating in that market. A market being large does not make participation in it profitable for any particular person, and this article does not suggest otherwise.

Read together, the two sources establish that retail CFD trading in Australia carries a majority-loss track record over a recent full year, inside a foreign-exchange market that is enormous in total turnover but says nothing about individual results. Neither fact confirms nor contradicts what Jordan or Cody said about their own accounts; it simply provides an outside reference point that the video itself does not offer.

Which sources support these statistics?

ASIC Report 828 and the Bank for International Settlements 2025 Triennial Survey support the cited statistics. They report market-wide CFD-loss and foreign-exchange-turnover data, not evidence that a trading method, educator or reader will obtain any particular result.

What questions do readers ask about this topic?

The answers below address the adjacent practical questions readers ask after reviewing the article and its source material. Each answer describes the available evidence and does not replace an independent review of current terms, risks or personal circumstances.

Did Rihari actually spend his own money on the corporate box?

The video does not confirm ownership or payment. Rihari says the box was booked around his son's birthday because nine seats together were not available, and the video shows him hosting mentorship members there, but no invoice, receipt, or payment source appears on screen or elsewhere.

Does the corporate box prove the mentorship students are profitable traders?

No. The video shows students describing their own trading history on camera. Jordan says he grew a live account to six figures and Cody says he lost money before improving after joining the mentorship, but both are individual, unverified statements, not audited results or a typical outcome for anyone in the program.

What other entertainment spending does the source material document?

None. The supplied transcript documents only the one NRL corporate box event. No other entertainment purchases, such as cars, travel, or luxury goods, are described in this source, so this article does not claim they exist.

Is trading forex or CFDs a realistic way to fund a millionaire lifestyle?

The source video presents trading success through personal testimonials, not audited data. Independently, [ASIC Report 828](https://download.asic.gov.au/media/tq0he35c/rep828-published-20-january-2026.pdf) found that 68% of Australian retail CFD investors lost money in the 2024 financial year, a materially different picture from the outcomes described on camera.

What is the difference between Rihari says and a verified fact in this article?

Rihari says or the video says marks a claim made by Rihari, a mentor, or a student in the source video that has not been independently checked. A verified fact is drawn only from the two permitted external sources, ASIC Report 828 and the BIS Triennial Survey, both linked directly where used.

Why doesn't this article put a dollar figure on the corporate box?

The video gives no price, invoice, or sponsorship detail for the box, food, or tickets. Any dollar figure would be invented rather than sourced, so this article does not include one.

Which RihariFX videos support this article?

The embedded RihariFX videos and their original English transcripts are the primary sources for the source-video claims in this article. They record what was said in each video and do not independently verify performance, price, licensing or typical results.

Day in the Life of a Millionaire: Renting an Entire VIP Box

General information only: This article is not personal financial advice. Trading and CFDs carry a risk of loss.