How do forex traders spend money shopping at Dubai Mall?
In the video, Rihari and his partner spend a full day shopping at Dubai Mall, buying electronics, activewear and a pair of Louis Vuitton shoes. The video says the trip followed a weekend in which Rihari says they made $100,000 from trading, though that figure is not independently verified.
The video opens with the pair leaving their accommodation, noting the outside temperature at around 40 degrees and taking a taxi rather than walking the short distance to Dubai Mall. Rihari says the heat was the reason for taking a car for what he describes as only a five-minute walk. From there the video moves into a sequence of stops inside the mall itself, mixing practical errands with browsing and, eventually, one large purchase.
Throughout the video, Rihari frames the day as a "day in the life" style vlog rather than a breakdown of trading performance, business income or a licensed financial product. The spending shown is presented as personal and discretionary. Nothing in the video describes a repeatable process, a guaranteed outcome or a business model that other traders could follow to reach the same result.
What did Rihari and his partner buy during the Dubai Mall trip?
The video shows Rihari and his partner buying microphones and a small tripod at Virgin Megastore, plus a local SIM card, before shopping for clothing at Alo and Gym Shark and trying on shoes at Louis Vuitton, which the video says were bought as wedding shoes.
The first stop the video documents is Virgin Megastore, where Rihari says he needed microphones for filming and picked up a small tripod he did not previously own. He also describes getting a residential SIM card there, calling it "a mission to get" and saying it is something travellers need because "you can't get that luck when you're on the other side of the world." This purchase is framed as a practical, work-related cost of making the trip and the video itself, rather than a lifestyle purchase.
From Virgin Megastore the video moves to a sequence of clothing stops. At Alo, the pair browse athleisure clothing, with Rihari's partner picking out several pieces including a jacket and considering colour options between green and grey for one item. The video shows some back-and-forth about whether to buy one item or both colours, ending with both being purchased. A stop the video calls "Kmart" (shown browsing women's items) is described on camera as a miss, with Rihari's partner saying "I'm not vibing" before the pair move on.
While browsing, Rihari's partner also looks at children's clothing and says she needs to send photos to her sister, half-joking that her sister will want the pair to buy them. Rihari responds that he will "have to send more money into the account," a passing comment about running short on funds mid-trip rather than a statement about trading capital, income or any account connected to trading activity.
At Gym Shark, the video spends more time in-store, with Rihari's partner trying on multiple leggings, tops and shorts in different sizes, discussing fit and fabric, and eventually buying several items including a set the video describes as a "store exclusive" colour. Rihari also mentions buying socks during this stop, saying he has "a thing about socks."
The final and largest purchase shown in the video is at Louis Vuitton, where Rihari's partner tries on a pair of shoes she describes wanting as wedding shoes. The video shows her asking for both available colours rather than one, with Rihari confirming the purchase.
Before deciding on the shoes, Rihari's partner remarks that "every time we go to Dubai or Singapore" the pair end up "adding to the little collection," referencing existing Louis Vuitton items, including a bag Rihari says he bought her on an earlier trip. The video treats this as an established pattern for the couple on international trips, rather than a one-off purchase specific to this Dubai Mall visit.
How much did the video say the Dubai Mall shopping trip cost?
The video says the Louis Vuitton shoes cost 7,300 AED per pair, and Rihari's partner asks for both colours, taking the total spent that day to about 16,000 AED, which the video converts to roughly $7,000 AUD across the full shopping trip.
On camera, Rihari checks the price of the shoes against what he recalls seeing online, stating "7,300 AED" and converting that in his head to roughly 4,000 in another currency before his partner confirms she wants both colours available in-store. Later in the video, Rihari totals the day's spending out loud, referencing "10,000 durhams" already spent earlier plus the shoe purchase, arriving at "16,000 durhams" for the full day. The video's own title and closing summary round this to "$7,000" spent shopping at Dubai Mall, which the video states in Australian dollars.
None of these figures are shown as receipts, bank statements or itemised totals on screen. They are spoken estimates and conversions made by Rihari and his partner in the moment, and the video does not reconcile the 16,000 AED running total with the closing $7,000 AUD figure item by item. Readers should treat both numbers as the video's own self-reported estimate of spending on a single shopping day, not as an audited or itemised figure.
Near the till, Rihari also mentions hoping to claim tax-free status on the purchase, saying "if I get the old tax free," a reference to the UAE's tourist VAT refund scheme rather than a discount applied to the prices already discussed. The video does not show whether the refund was successfully claimed, and this detail is included only as something said on camera, not as confirmation of a lower net cost.
What trading claims did Rihari make in the video, and how should they be read?
Rihari says on camera that he and his partner "made 100,000 last weekend," which the video uses to justify the day's spending. This is a spoken claim inside a personal vlog, not a disclosed trade record, audited return, licensed financial product or business result.
The claim appears at the start of the video, before any shopping takes place, and is repeated near the end when Rihari jokes "lucky we made 100,000 last weekend" after totalling the day's spending. In both instances, the figure is stated once, in passing, with no currency specified, no time period beyond "last weekend," no breakdown of how it was earned, and no supporting documentation shown in the video.
Because this is a personal vlog and not a disclosure document, the claim carries none of the protections or context that a regulated financial promotion would require. It does not say whether the figure refers to gross trading profit, net profit after losses, account growth, a business figure, or something else entirely. It does not indicate whether the result is typical, unusual, or a one-off. It does not name an entity, licence, product or service that a viewer could act on. Readers should treat it strictly as "Rihari says," a spoken personal claim inside a lifestyle video, and not as evidence of what any trader, including Rihari, can expect to earn from forex or CFD trading generally.
What do independently verified statistics say about retail forex and CFD trading?
Independently verified data shows retail CFD trading is loss-heavy for most participants. ASIC Report 828 records that 68% of Australian retail CFD investors lost money in the 2024 financial year, a figure separate from and not confirmed by anything shown in this video.
This figure comes from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, the regulator responsible for overseeing retail CFD and margin FX providers operating in Australia. It is drawn from aggregated account-level data reported by CFD issuers, not from a survey or a self-reported sample, and it covers the full population of Australian retail CFD investors across the 2024 financial year rather than a single trader, platform or promotional claim.
Separately, the BIS 2025 Triennial Survey reports that average daily over-the-counter foreign-exchange turnover reached US$9.6 trillion in April 2025, as measured by the Bank for International Settlements. This figure describes the scale and liquidity of the global FX market as a whole. It says nothing about how individual retail traders, including anyone shown in this video, perform within that market, and it should not be read as evidence of profitability for retail participants.
Together, these two figures describe the market's size and its typical retail outcome. Neither figure confirms, contradicts or otherwise verifies any spending, income or trading claim made inside the Dubai Mall video.
How does the video's shopping narrative compare with verified trading statistics?
The video's shopping narrative and the verified market data measure different things and should not be blended. One is a personal spending vlog with an unverified profit claim; the other is regulator and central-bank data on how retail forex and CFD trading actually performs across a full market.
| | Video narrative (Rihari says / the video says) | Independently verified statistic | |---|---|---| | Source | Personal YouTube vlog, spoken on camera | ASIC Report 828 and BIS 2025 Triennial Survey | | What it covers | One individual's self-reported weekend result and one day of spending | Full-population retail CFD outcomes and total global FX market turnover | | Documentation shown | None; figures are spoken estimates, not receipts or statements | Regulator-aggregated account data and central-bank survey data | | Time period | "Last weekend" (undated) and one shopping day | 2024 financial year (ASIC); April 2025 (BIS) | | What it can support | A description of what the video shows Rihari saying and buying | A statement about typical retail CFD outcomes and market size | | What it cannot support | A claim about typical trading results, income or safety | Any conclusion about Rihari's specific account, business or claim |
What steps did the Dubai Mall shopping trip follow, according to the video?
The video follows a loose but visible order of stops across one hot day in Dubai, moving from transport and errands into store-by-store browsing and finishing with a single large purchase, matching the sequence Rihari and his partner narrate on camera.
- Leaving accommodation and travelling to Dubai Mall. Rihari notes the outdoor temperature at around 40 degrees and says the pair take a taxi rather than walk the roughly five-minute distance, to avoid arriving "sweaty."
- Virgin Megastore for equipment and a SIM card. The video shows Rihari buying microphones, a small tripod, and a residential SIM card, which he describes as difficult to obtain and necessary for the trip.
- Browsing Alo for activewear. Rihari's partner picks out several athleisure pieces, including a jacket, and the video shows discussion over colour choice before items are purchased.
- A stop the video calls "Kmart," which does not lead to a purchase. Rihari's partner says "I'm not vibing" about the women's section shown, and the pair move on without buying anything there.
- Gym Shark for leggings, tops and accessories. The video shows extended trying-on of multiple sizes and colours, a mention of buying socks, and several items being purchased, including a "store exclusive" colour.
- Louis Vuitton for shoes described as wedding shoes. Rihari's partner tries on a pair priced, per the video, at 7,300 AED, and asks for both available colours rather than one.
- Totalling the day's spend on camera. Rihari adds up the day's purchases out loud, referencing 10,000 AED spent earlier plus the shoe purchase, for a total the video states as around 16,000 AED, summarised in the video's closing as roughly $7,000 AUD.
Should this video be treated as investment or income advice?
No. This video should not be treated as investment, income or financial advice. It is a lifestyle shopping vlog that references a personal trading claim without evidence, and it makes no licensing, business, pricing or typical-results statement that a viewer could rely on.
The video does not name a broker, platform, course, signal service or fee structure. It does not say what Rihari trades, over what timeframe, with what amount of capital, or with what level of leverage. It does not disclose losses, drawdowns, or how the "100,000 last weekend" figure was calculated. None of this is a criticism of the video, which presents itself as a personal shopping vlog rather than a financial disclosure, but it does mean the video cannot responsibly be read as guidance on what forex or CFD trading typically produces.
For that question, the only responsibly sourced answer available is the independently verified data cited above: ASIC Report 828 found that 68% of Australian retail CFD investors lost money in the 2024 financial year, against a global FX market that the BIS 2025 Triennial Survey measured at US$9.6 trillion in average daily turnover in April 2025. A single spoken claim inside a shopping vlog, unverified and undocumented, does not change what that regulator and central-bank data shows about typical retail outcomes.
Which sources support these statistics?
ASIC Report 828 and the Bank for International Settlements 2025 Triennial Survey support the cited statistics. They report market-wide CFD-loss and foreign-exchange-turnover data, not evidence that a trading method, educator or reader will obtain any particular result.
- ASIC Report 828: Risky business — 68% of retail CFD investors lost money in FY24.
- Bank for International Settlements 2025 Triennial Survey — OTC FX turnover reached US$9.6 trillion per day in April 2025.
What questions do readers ask about this topic?
The answers below address the adjacent practical questions readers ask after reviewing the article and its source material. Each answer describes the available evidence and does not replace an independent review of current terms, risks or personal circumstances.
Who is shown in the Dubai Mall shopping video?
The video is presented as a personal day-in-the-life vlog featuring Rihari and his partner shopping together at Dubai Mall. The video does not introduce either person with a business title, licence, qualification or company affiliation; it presents the day purely as a personal shopping trip filmed for a YouTube channel. Any reference to "RihariFX" or a trading identity sits outside what is shown or said in this specific video, and this article does not attach one to the other beyond what Rihari himself says on camera.
Did the video show proof of the "$100,000 last weekend" claim?
No. The video says Rihari made the claim twice, once near the start and once near the end, both times spoken casually with no supporting document, screenshot, statement or breakdown shown on screen. There is no stated currency, no stated time period beyond "last weekend," and no explanation of how the figure was calculated or what it represents. Because the claim is unverified, this article attributes it strictly as something Rihari says, not as a confirmed trading result, and does not use it to draw any conclusion about typical trading outcomes.
Is $7,000 AUD an accurate total for everything shown being bought in the video?
The $7,000 AUD figure is the video's own closing summary of the day's spending, spoken by Rihari rather than shown as an itemised receipt. Earlier in the video he separately totals "16,000 durhams" (AED) for the day, combining an earlier 10,000 AED and the Louis Vuitton purchase. The video does not reconcile these two figures against each other or against the individual items shown being bought at Virgin Megastore, Alo and Gym Shark, so both numbers should be read as the video's rounded, spoken estimate rather than an audited total.
Why does this article cite ASIC Report 828 and the BIS Triennial Survey instead of using figures from the video?
These two sources are used because they are independently produced, publicly available and verifiable, unlike any figure spoken inside the video. ASIC Report 828 is regulator-published data on actual outcomes for Australian retail CFD investors, and the BIS 2025 Triennial Survey is central-bank data on the scale of the global FX market. Neither source references this video, Rihari, or any specific trader, and neither should be read as commentary on the video's claims; they are included only to give readers an accurate, sourced picture of what retail forex and CFD trading generally involves.
Does the video describe how Rihari trades or what strategy he uses?
No. The video is a shopping vlog and does not describe a trading strategy, platform, instrument, timeframe, position size or risk approach at any point. The only trading-related content in the video is the single spoken line about making "100,000 last weekend," used as a reason for the day's spending rather than as an explanation of how that result was reached. Readers looking for information on trading method, risk management or platform choice will not find it in this video.
Does this video make any licensing, business or typical-results claim?
No. The video does not state that Rihari holds a financial services licence, does not describe a business, course, signal service or product for sale, and does not claim that the spending shown or the profit mentioned is typical of what any trader, follower or customer could expect. It is framed throughout as a personal lifestyle vlog about one shopping day, and this article does not extend it into a business, licensing, performance or typical-results claim beyond what is actually shown or said on screen.
What should a reader take away from comparing this video to the verified statistics?
The comparison shows a clear gap between a single, undocumented personal claim and the documented, full-population outcome for retail CFD traders. Per ASIC Report 828, 68% of Australian retail CFD investors lost money in the 2024 financial year, which stands regardless of any one person's spoken result in a shopping vlog. A single unverified success story, even a specific dollar figure stated on camera, does not represent what most retail traders experience, and readers should weigh the two sources of information very differently.
Did the video include anything besides shopping and the trading claim?
Yes. Between store visits, the video detours through Dubai Mall's aquarium and underwater zoo, with Rihari and his partner pointing out stingrays, an eel-like fish, and what they believe were penguins and crocodiles near the top of the exhibit, plus a passing comment on how luxurious the mall's public toilets are. Rihari also says the original reason he wanted to visit Gym Shark was that the Dubai store carried merchandise exclusive to that location, though he adds he no longer wears the item he is referencing. None of these asides involve a purchase or add to the spending total discussed elsewhere in the video; they are included here only because Rihari and his partner state them directly on camera.
Which RihariFX videos support this article?
The embedded RihariFX videos and their original English transcripts are the primary sources for the source-video claims in this article. They record what was said in each video and do not independently verify performance, price, licensing or typical results.